SUBPOENA SERVED ON LEON MAURICE ROWE et al v. ROWE
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA |
LEON MAURICE ROWE |
SUBPOENA SERVED ON LEON MAURICE ROWE |
1:2022mc00095 |
October 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Reggie B Walton |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Respondent Opposition, If Any, To The Petitioner's Motion To Compel due by 12/19/2022. (mac) |
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the respondent's #6 Consent Motion to Further Extend Time to Oppose Petitioner's Motion to Compel, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the respondent's #6 Consent Motion to Further Extend Time to Oppose Petitioner's Motion to Compel is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to December 9, 2022. It is further ORDERED that, on or before December 19, 2022, the respondent shall file his opposition, if any, to the petitioner's motion to compel. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on December 12, 2022. (lcrbw2) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply To Oppose Petitioners Motion To Compel by LEON MAURICE ROWE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Grove, Callyson) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Respondent Opposition To Petitioner's Motion To Compel due by 12/9/2022 (mac) |
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the respondent's #4 Consent Motion to Extend Time to Oppose Petitioner's Motion to Compel, and the respondent's #5 Modified Consent Motion to Extend Time to Oppose Petitioner's Motion to Compel, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the respondent's #5 Modified Consent Motion to Extend Time to Oppose Petitioner's Motion to Compel is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the respondent's #4 Consent Motion to Extend Time to Oppose Petitioner's Motion to Compel is DENIED AS MOOT. It is further ORDERED that, on or before December 9, 2022, the respondent shall file his opposition, if any, to the petitioner's motion to compel. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on December 1, 2022. (lcrbw2) |
MINUTE ORDER. The Court having considered the petitioner's #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, and it appearing to the Court that the attorney referenced therein meets the requirements for pro hac vice admission under this Court's rules, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Charles Michael, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036, is ADMITTED to practice before the Court pro hac vice in this case. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) #Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on December 1, 2022. (lcrbw2) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply To Oppose Petitioners Motion To Compel by LEON MAURICE ROWE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Grove, Callyson) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #1 Petitioner's Motion to Compel by LEON MAURICE ROWE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Grove, Callyson); Modified on 11/10/2022 to add docket entry relationship (ztth). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Callyson Taylor Grove on behalf of LEON MAURICE ROWE (Grove, Callyson) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Charles Michael, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9613527. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Charles Michael, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Baratz, Michael) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Compel (Filing fee $ 49 receipt number 203234.) filed by GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration Charles Michael, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Text of Proposed Order) (ztth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.