JOHNSON v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
| LARRY B. JOHNSON |
| U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION |
| 1:2023cv00068 |
| January 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of Provisional/Government Not Certified Status re #6 AFFIDAVIT on Proof of Service by LARRY B. JOHNSON. (Lopatto, John).Your attorney renewal/government certification has not been received. As a result, your membership with the U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia is not in good standing, and you are not permitted to file. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.9, you must immediately correct your membership status by following the appropriate instructions on this page of our website: https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-renewal. Please be advised that the presiding judge in this case has been notified that you are currently not in good standing to file in this court. Renewal Due by 3/15/2023. (zbaj) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT on Proof of Service by LARRY B. JOHNSON. (Lopatto, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Dedra Seibel Curteman on behalf of All Defendants (Curteman, Dedra) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zed) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE to Attorney General for the United States filed by LARRY B. JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Summons to U.S. Attorney District of Columbia)(Lopatto, John) Modified docket text/event on 1/11/2023 (zed). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zsl) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to JLopatto3@gmail.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing summonses-government. When naming a government agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the U.S. Attorney & U.S. Attorney General. Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. (zsl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9779498) filed by Larry Baker Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Lopatto, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LARRY B. JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | John Simon Lopatto, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION | |
| Represented By: | Dedra Seibel Curteman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
