DAVIS v. U.S. GOVERNMENT
MICHAEL L. DABIS and MICHAEL L. DAVIS |
U.S. GOVERNMENT |
1:2023cv00087 |
January 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis #5 and motion to appoint counsel #3 are denied without prejudice. Plaintiffs motion to withdraw case #6 is GRANTED. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 03/06/2023. (zljn) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Withdraw case by MICHAEL L. DAVIS. (zljn) |
Filing 5 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL L. DAVIS. (zljn) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See Order for more details. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 01/31/2023. (zljn) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by MICHAEL L. DAVIS. (zljn). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL L. DAVIS. (zljn). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. GOVERNMENT filed by MICHAEL L. DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zljn). |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 01/12/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zljn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.