TRUESDALE v. UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE et al
ALVIN B. TRUESDALE |
UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFECTIONS DISEASE, DIVISION OF QUARANTINE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
1:2023cv00092 |
January 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Prisoner Petition: Mandamus & Other (Other) |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, DIVISION OF QUARANTINE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFECTIONS DISEASE, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 203806) filed by ALVIN B. TRUESDALE. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztth) |
SUMMONS Not Issued as to CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, DIVISION OF QUARANTINE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFECTIONS DISEASE, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE (ztth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.