INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
| INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH |
| DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
| 1:2023cv00172 |
| January 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kieran O'Neill Carter on behalf of All Defendants (Carter, Kieran) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/24/2023. (lcrdm1)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zcb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Cochran Horner on behalf of INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH (Horner, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9802444) filed by INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Hardin, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
