BROOKS v. U.S. ARMY 1ST INFORMATION OPERATIONS COMMAND et al
ANTONIO GREGORY BROOKS |
U.S. ARMY 1ST INFORMATION OPERATIONS COMMAND, DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY, U.S. ARMY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE COMMAND and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION |
1:2023cv00189 |
January 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 02/10/2023. (zsl) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 02/10/2023. (zsl) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by ANTONIO GREGORY BROOKS. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(zsl) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by ANTONIO GREGORY BROOKS re #1 Complaint (zsl) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ANTONIO GREGORY BROOKS. (zsl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by ANTONIO GREGORY BROOKS. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsl) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 01/20/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.