TOWER v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
| ANDREW TOWER |
| UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION |
| 1:2023cv00204 |
| January 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 4/7/2023. (tb) |
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of #7 defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to complaint, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by not later than April 7, 2023. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 2/23/2023. (lcjdb2)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with proposed order by UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION. (O'Tousa, Christina) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION served on 1/31/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS Tracking)(Dorey, David) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 02/01/23. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt of Service)(Dorey, David) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 1/25/2023. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt of Service)(Dorey, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Tessa Elizabeth Shurr on behalf of ANDREW TOWER (Shurr, Tessa) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9811238) filed by ANDREW TOWER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons U.S. Customs & Border Protection, #6 Summons U.S. Attorney, #7 Summons U.S. Attorney General)(Dorey, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zrtw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TOWER v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANDREW TOWER | |
| Represented By: | David Richard Dorey |
| Represented By: | Tessa Elizabeth Shurr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION | |
| Represented By: | Christina O'Tousa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
