MALIK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
| ZEESHAN AMJAD MALIK |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. EMBASSY & CONSULATE ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, ANTONY BLINKEN, DONALD BLOME and ANTONY J. BLINKEN |
| 1:2023cv00264 |
| January 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, DONALD BLOME, U.S. EMBASSY & CONSULATE ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zrtw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9823455) filed by ZEESHAN AMJAD MALIK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Summons as to United States Department of State, #4 Summons as to U.S. Consulate and Embassy in Pakistan, Islamabad, #5 Summons as to Antony Blinken, #6 Summons as to Donald Blome, #7 Summons as to the U.S. Attorney's Office, #8 Summons as to the U.S. Attorney General of the United States)(Meyer, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
