FAN v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
LINGLING FAN |
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, NEBRASKA STATE PATROL TROOP A, AAC FUNDING IV LLC and SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY |
1:2023cv00337 |
February 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Memorandum & Opinion, #4 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case, Sent to LINGLING FAN; New Address: Unknown; Unable to forward. (zljn) |
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 02/17/2023. (zljn) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 02/17/2023. (zljn) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LINGLING FAN. (zrtw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by LINGLING FAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(zrtw) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 2/6/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrtw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.