PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
| PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST |
| INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
| 1:2023cv00340 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Royce C Lamberth |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 4/3/2023. (lcrcl2)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motion by INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bruce, Elisabeth)
|
|
NOTICE OF ERROR regarding #5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motion. The following error(s) need correction: Title on document does not match document/event. Please refile. (znmw)
|
|
Filing 5
ENTERED IN ERROR.....Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motion by INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bruce, Elisabeth) Modified on 3/30/2023 (znmw).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Local Rule 16.3(b)(10) exempts parties to a FOIA action from typical scheduling order requirements. Instead, the government has the burden to produce a Vaughn index with a supporting dispositive motion. The Court therefore ORDERS the government to file the index and supporting motion within 30 days. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 3/10/2023. (lcrcl2)
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to Complaint by INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.(Bruce, Elisabeth)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9842907) filed by PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - FOIA Request, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Interim Response Letter, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Response to Interim Response Letter, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Jan. 12 Letter, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Jan. 13 Letter, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - IRS Final Response, #7 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons Summons - US Attorney's Office, #9 Summons Summons - US Attorney General, #10 Summons Summons - IRS Chief Counsel)(Lawkowski, Gary)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zsl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST | |
| Represented By: | Gary Lawkowski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | Elisabeth Bruce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
