BREWER v. WRAY et al
| DENNIS SHELDON BREWER |
| CHRISTOPHER WRAY, KIMBERLY CHEATLE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN, WILLIAM BURNS, LLOYD AUSTIN, STEFANIE TOMPKINS, FRANK KENDALL, III, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, CARLOS DEL TORO, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, JANET L. YELLEN and LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III |
| 1:2023cv00415 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- Dennis Sheldon Brewer; Motion. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to file DENIED. First, plaintiff cannot amend his complaint because this case was already dismissed on2/28/23. Second, plaintiff has noted an appeal, consequently, this court is want of subject matter jurisdiction. Third, leave to amend will not be granted when, as here, such amendment would be futile. See Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 49 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). Therefore, assuming plaintiff could even file this submission, the relief sought would be futile because the proposed amendments herein failed to remedy any of the noted original deficiencies." Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 4/10/2023. (zrtw) |
| USCA Case Number 23-5052 for 11 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court filed by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. (zrtw) |
| Filing 13 Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed (Memorandum Opinion), and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The fee was not paid because it was filed in forma pauperis re 11 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court. (zmrl) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO DC CIRCUIT COURT as to #10 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case, by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (zmrl) |
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail.. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 2/28/2023. (zmrl)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Exhibits by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11, #11 Part 12)(znmw) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Exhibits by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER.. (zrtw) Modified on 3/1/2023 (znmw). |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Certify Class by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. (Attachment: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(zrtw) |
| Filing 5 EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Injunction by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. (Attachment: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(zrtw) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER filed by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (zrtw) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER re #1 Complaint (zrtw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. (zrtw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by DENNIS SHELDON BREWER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(zrtw) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 2/14/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrtw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
