GAKUBA v. D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Petitioner: PETER GAKUBA
Respondent: D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 1:2023cv00458
Filed: February 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Alter Judgment as to #5 Memorandum & Opinion, #6 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case, by PETER GAKUBA. (zsl)
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 04/13/2023. (zljn)
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 04/13/2023. (zljn)
March 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Jurisdiction/Venue Statement by PETER GAKUBA (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Exhibit Volume 1 Part 1, #3 Exhibit Volume 1 Part 2, #4 Exhibit Volume 1 Part 3, #5 Exhibit Volume 1 Part 4, #6 Exhibit Volume 1 Part 5, #7 Exhibit Volume 1 Part 6, #8 Exhibit Volume 1 Part 7, #9 Exhibit Volume 1 Part 8, #10 Exhibit Volume 2, #11 Exhibit Volume 3 Part 1, #12 Exhibit Volume 3 Part 2, #13 Exhibit Volume 3 Part 3, #14 Exhibit Volume 4 Part 1, #15 Exhibit Volume 4 Part 2, #16 Exhibit Volume 4 Part 3, #17 Exhibit Volume 4 Part 4, #18 Exhibit Volume 4 Part 5, #19 Exhibit Volume 4 Part 6, #20 Exhibit Volume 4 Part 7, #21 Exhibit Volume 5, #22 Exhibit Volume 6 Part 1, #23 Exhibit Volume 6 Part 2, #24 Exhibit Volume 7 Part 1, #25 Exhibit Volume 7 Part 2)(zsl)
February 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by PETER GAKUBA (zsl)
February 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by PETER GAKUBA. (zsl)
February 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by PETER GAKUBA. (Attachment: #1 Statement of Facts)(zsl)
February 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 02/14/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been sent via NEF to the email address of record for the pro se party. (zsl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GAKUBA v. D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PETER GAKUBA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?