LINDSAY v. FORT MEYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
| JACQUELINE LINDSAY |
| FORT MEYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION |
| 1:2023cv00480 |
| February 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by FORT MEYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (Schuler, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Erwin Schuler on behalf of FORT MEYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (Schuler, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by FORT MEYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Schuler, Joseph) |
MINUTE ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's #4 Consent Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Complaint, filed March 15, 2023. Defendant represents that the parties intend to commence mediation in April 2023 and therefore requests that the Court extend Defendant's deadline to answer from March 15, 2023 to May 5, 2023. As Plaintiff consents, and upon good cause shown, Defendant's #4 Consent Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Complaint, filed March 15, 2023 is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs #1 Complaint on or before May 5, 2023. Finally, the parties shall note that, per the Court's #3 Order, all requests for extension of time must be filed at least four business days in advance of the affected deadline. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 15, 2023. (lcckk1)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs #1 Complaint on or before 5/5/2023. (dot) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/22/2023. (DM)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to FORT MEYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zrtw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FORT MEYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9874872) filed by JACQUELINE LINDSAY. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wachtel, David) (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/22/2023) (zrtw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LINDSAY v. FORT MEYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JACQUELINE LINDSAY | |
| Represented By: | David M. Wachtel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FORT MEYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Erwin Schuler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
