REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN v. STATI et al
REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN |
ANATOLIE STATI, GABRIEL STATI, ASCOM GROUP, S.A. and TERRA RAF TRANS TRAIDING LTD |
1:2023cv00565 |
March 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amit P Mehta |
Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 0202 Award under Convention on Foreign Arbitral Awards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to ASCOM GROUP, S.A., ANATOLIE STATI, GABRIEL STATI, TERRA RAF TRANS TRAIDING LTD. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zrtw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ASCOM GROUP, S.A., ANATOLIE STATI, GABRIEL STATI, TERRA RAF TRANS TRAIDING LTD with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9893092) filed by REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Belgium Judgment, #2 Exhibit B - Amsterdam Judgment, #3 Exhibit C - KPMG Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(Kirtland, Matthew) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to matthew.kirtland@nortonrosefulbright.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Attorney is provisional. Please renew your membership. See https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-renewal., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zrtw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.