ULIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
| ERIC ULIS |
| FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| 1:2023cv00636 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Jia M Cobb |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
FOX ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF 3) by May 29, 2023. Failure to respond by that date may result in the Court deeming the matter conceded. See document for details. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on April 28, 2023. (lcjmc2)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss by FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Walker, Anna)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Anna Davis Walker on behalf of FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Walker, Anna)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 204155) filed by ERIC ULIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(zed)
|
|
SUMMONS Not Issued as to FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (zed)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
