WU v. PALMER et al
Plaintiff: BRYAN WU
Defendant: MATTHEW PALMER, ANTONY BLINKEN and ANTONY J. BLINKEN
Case Number: 1:2023cv00672
Filed: March 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Randolph D Moss
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by BRYAN WU (Goldstein, Joshua)
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, Dkt. #5 , it is hereby ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the case. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 4/17/2023. (lcrdm1)
March 21, 2023 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 3/14/2023. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 5/13/2023.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 03/21/2023., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 3/21/2023; MATTHEW PALMER served on 3/21/2023 (Goldstein, Joshua)
March 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 3/13/2023. (lcrdm1)
March 13, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, MATTHEW PALMER, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb)
March 13, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY BLINKEN, MATTHEW PALMER ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9920355) filed by BRYAN WU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua)
March 13, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zcb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WU v. PALMER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRYAN WU
Represented By: Joshua L. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MATTHEW PALMER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?