FARMER v. KIJAKAZI et al
| DEE DEIDRE FARMER |
| KILOLO KIJAKAZI, JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2 and JANE DOE 3 |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2023cv00729 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Jia M Cobb |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XV1 |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Assigned to Judge Jia M. Cobb. (zsl) |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to KILOLO KIJAKAZI Electronic notice has been provided to the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and to the U.S. Attorney's Office pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405g.Answer due by 5/25/2023, (zsl) |
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion #2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk shall assign this case randomly to a district judge for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 3/22/2023. (psu1)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DEE DEIDRE FARMER. (zsl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by DEE DEIDRE FARMER.(zsl) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 03/14/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
