THORNE v. HOWELL et al
| LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE |
| BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS |
| 1:2023cv00778 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE; Notice. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to file DENIED". Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on 4/7/2023. (zed) |
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) DENYING petitioner's #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, for the reasons explained on the record at petitioner's sentencing hearing on Friday, March 31, 2023, in Criminal Case No. 18-cr-389. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on March 31, 2023. (lcbah3)
|
| Filing 3 Case directly reassigned to Judge Beryl A. Howell by consent. Judge Trevor N. McFadden is no longer assigned to the case. (rj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE (zed) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 204290.) filed by LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
