MASHHOUR et al v. BLINKEN et al
| ABDUL KHALEK MASHHOUR and NELLY NAHHAS |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, HENRY T. WOOSTER and JOHN DOE |
| 1:2023cv00877 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ABDUL KHALEK MASHHOUR, NELLY NAHHAS (Ahmed, Sadaf) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, HENRY T. WOOSTER, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JOHN DOE, HENRY T. WOOSTER ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9966211) filed by ABDUL KHALEK MASHHOUR, NELLY NAHHAS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT C, #4 Summons SUMMON FOR U.S. ATTORNEY, #5 Summons SUMMONS FOR ATT. GENERAL, #6 Summons SUMMONS FOR ANTONY J. BLI NKEN, #7 Summons SUMMONS FOR RENA BITTER, #8 Summons SUMMONS FOR HENRY T. WOOSTER, #9 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET)(Ahmed, Sadaf) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zljn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
