WOUBETU v. PAT HANDY LEGACY SHELTER et al
| SAMSON WOUBETU |
| PAT HANDY LEGACY SHELTER and CATHOLIC CHARITIES |
| 1:2023cv00945 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
LEAVE TO FILE DENIED- SAMSON WOUBETU; Motion. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. "Leave to file DENIED in Case Nos. 23-cv-945 and 23-cv-946. Both cases were already dismissed." Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 04/27/2023. (zljn)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 4/20/2023. (zrtw)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 4/19/2023. (zrtw)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SAMSON WOUBETU. (zrtw)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CATHOLIC CHARITIES, PAT HANDY LEGACY SHELTER filed by SAMSON WOUBETU.(zrtw)
|
|
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 4/6/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrtw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
