ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC. et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al
ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., CBS BROADCASTING INC., THE E.W. SCRIPPS COMPANY, GANNETT CO., INC., POLITICO LLC, PRO PUBLICA, INC., THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, ASSOCIATED PRESS, E.W. SCRIPPS COMPANY and NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION |
1:2023cv01014 |
April 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amit P Mehta |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER. The parties shall file an additional Joint Status Report by June 13, 2023, which updates the court on the processing and production of responsive records. The parties shall indicate in the Joint Status Report whether a status conference will be needed. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 05/31/2023. (lcapm3) |
Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT by EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. (Rebo, Samuel) |
Filing 7 ORDER. Both a Complaint and an Answer are now before the court in this FOIA case. It is hereby ordered that the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before May 30, 2023. The Joint Status Report shall include (1) the status of Plaintiffs FOIA request; (2) the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiffs FOIA request; (3) the anticipated date(s) for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff; (4) whether a motion for stay is likely under Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976); and (5) whether the parties anticipate summary judgment briefing and, if so, a proposed briefing schedule. See attached Order. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 05/16/2023. (lcapm3) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 5/30/2023. (smc) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.(Rebo, Samuel) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel Rebo on behalf of All Defendants (Rebo, Samuel) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/13/2023. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 5/13/2023. (Tobin, Charles) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC., CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., CBS BROADCASTING INC., GANNETT CO., INC., POLITICO LLC, PRO PUBLICA, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, THE E.W. SCRIPPS COMPANY, THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY (Tobin, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by GANNETT CO., INC., CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., POLITICO LLC, PRO PUBLICA, INC., ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC., CBS BROADCASTING INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 AG Summons, #11 EOUSA Summons, #12 FBI Summons, #13 USAO Summons)(Tobin, Charles) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zrtw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.