TROTTER v. U.S. DEPT OF NAVY et al
LATASHA TROTTER |
U.S. DEPT OF NAVY and ADAM ALEXANDER EIG |
1:2023cv01045 |
April 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amy Berman Jackson |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Property Damage |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPT OF NAVY served on 4/25/2023 (znmw) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ADAM ALEXANDER EIG served on 5/9/2023, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 5/15/2023., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/15/2023. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/14/2023.) (zed) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Pro-Bono Counsel by LATASHA TROTTER. (zed) |
Filing 3 EXHIBITS by LATASHA TROTTER.. (zjm) |
Filing 2 NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by LATASHA TROTTER (zjm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADAM ALEXANDER EIG, U.S. DEPT OF NAVY ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 204457) filed by LATASHA TROTTER. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zjm) |
SUMMONS (4) Issued as to ADAM ALEXANDER EIG, U.S. DEPT OF NAVY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.