ERICKSON et al v. BLINKEN
| STEPHANIE ERICKSON and PHILIPPE DUPUIS |
| ANTONY J. BLINKEN |
| 1:2023cv01051 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by PHILIPPE DUPUIS, STEPHANIE ERICKSON (Bless, Jesse) |
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) DISMISSING this matter, without prejudice, pursuant to plaintiffs' #4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on May 10, 2023. (lcbah1)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on April 17, 2023. (lcbah1)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Beryl A. Howell. (zcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTONY J. BLINKEN ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10001502) filed by STEPHANIE ERICKSON, PHILIPPE DUPUIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Blinken, #3 Summons USAG, #4 Summons USAO)(Bless, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
