JEAN-BAPTISTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
| HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and CIVIL PROCESS CLERK FOR THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE |
| 1:2023cv01054 |
| April 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
USCA Case Number 23-5130 for #8 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court filed by HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE. (znmw)
|
|
Filing 9
Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed (Memorandum Opinion), and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The fee remains to be paid and another notice will be transmitted when the fee has been paid in the District Court or motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis has been decided re #8 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court. (zjm)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF APPEAL TO DC CIRCUIT COURT as to #7 Order, #6 Memorandum & Opinion by HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (zjm)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion to Plaintiff at his address of record. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 5/31/2023. (lcja)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION re Complaint. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 5/31/2023. (lcja)
|
|
Filing 5
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/24/2023. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/23/2023.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 4/24/23., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS served on 4/24/2023; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE served on 4/24/2023; CHRISTOPHER WRAY served on 4/24/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(zjm)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to CIVIL PROCESS CLERK FOR THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zjm)
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED COMPLAINT against CIVIL PROCESS CLERK FOR THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CHRISTOPHER WRAY with Jury Demand filed by HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(zjm)
|
|
Filing 2
NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE (zjm)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CIVIL PROCESS CLERK FOR THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CHRISTOPHER WRAY ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 204468) with Jury Demand filed by HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zjm)
|
|
SUMMONS Not Issued as to CIVIL PROCESS CLERK FOR THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CHRISTOPHER WRAY (zjm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
