JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
| JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| 1:2023cv01162 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Royce C Lamberth |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Bekesha, Michael) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/4/2023. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/3/2023.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 5/10/2023., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE served on 5/10/2023 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Brooke Paz)(Bekesha, Michael) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting Motion #6 for Extension of Time to Respond. Defendant's response due by 7/5/2023. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 6/16/2023. (lcrcl2)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bardo, John) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 6/20/2023. (zsmc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting Motion #4 for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Response due by 06/20/2023. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 05/31/2023. (lcrcl2)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bardo, John) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (zcb) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Bekesha, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10028035) filed by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons U.S. Department of Justice, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #4 Summons U.S. Attorney)(Bekesha, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Bekesha |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE | |
| Represented By: | John Bardo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
