SIVANANTHAN v. BLINKEN et al
NISHANTH SIVANANTHAN |
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, CONN SCHRADER and DANETTE SULLIVAN |
1:2023cv01181 |
April 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF ERROR regarding #8 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant. The following error(s) need correction: Incorrect event. Please refile using Summons Returned executed as to US Attorney if US Attorney served. Please refile using Summons Returned executed as to U.S. Attorney General if served. For federal Defendants, please refile using Summons returned Executed as to Federal Defendant. Select parties that have been served and enter date of delivery (not date mailed). Please refile. (zjm) |
Filing 8 ENTERED IN ERROR.....RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY J. BLINKEN served on 5/10/2023 (Mitchell, Adriana) Modified on 6/16/2023 (zjm). |
Filing 7 DECLARATION of familiarity with the Court's Local Rules by NISHANTH SIVANANTHAN. (Mitchell, Adriana) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Adriana Mitchell on behalf of NISHANTH SIVANANTHAN (Mitchell, Adriana) |
MINUTE ORDER. The Court is in receipt of the #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Attorney Adriana Mitchell, to appear as counsel for Plaintiff Nishanth Sivananthan. The Court GRANTS the #4 Motion CONTINGENT on said attorney filing a declaration certifying familiarity with this Court's Local Rules by no later than MAY 3, 2023. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) #Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 5/1/23. (lcckk3) |
Filing 5 ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 4/28/23. (DM) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Adriana Mitchell, Fee Status: No Fee Paid. by NISHANTH SIVANANTHAN. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit)(Messer, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, CONN SCHRADER, DANETTE SULLIVAN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
Filing 2 ENTERED IN ERROR..... MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Adriana Mitchell, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-10032801. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by NISHANTH SIVANANTHAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit cert. of good standing)(Messer, Benjamin) Modified on 4/28/2023 (znmw). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for APA review and writ of mandamus against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10032703) filed by NISHANTH SIVANANTHAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Errata E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Summons to Dept. of State, #9 Summons to NVC, #10 Summons to Embassy, #11 Summons to USAG, #12 Summons to US Atty)(Messer, Benjamin) |
NOTICE OF ERROR regarding #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Adriana Mitchell. The following error(s) need correction: Incorrect document/procedure; must be written motion filed signed by sponsoring attorney. Invalid attorney signature- signature on document must match PACER login. Please refile in accordance with Local Rule 83.2(c). (znmw) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.