KARADZIC et al v. GACKI et al
| ALEKSANDAR KARADZIC, LJILJANA ZELEN KARADZIC and SONJA KARADZIC JOVICEVIC |
| ANDREA M. GACKI and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL |
| 1:2023cv01226 |
| May 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANDREA M. GACKI served on 5/9/2023; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL served on 5/9/2023 (Attachments: #1 Waybill USPS tracking form--Gacki, #2 Waybill USPS tracking form--OFAC)(Robinson, Peter) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10039484) filed by ALEKSANDAR KARADZIC, SONJA KARADZIC JOVICEVIC, LJILJANA ZELEN KARADZIC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Robinson, Peter) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/2/2023) (zljn). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zljn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
