SAMI et al v. BLINKEN et al
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD SAMI, SAMRA SAMI and AJAR SAMI
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN and ANDREW SCHOFER
Case Number: 1:2023cv01363
Filed: May 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Carl J Nichols
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by AJAR SAMI, MUHAMMAD SAMI, SAMRA SAMI (Casazza, Christopher)
June 5, 2023 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/15/2023. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/14/2023.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 05/18/2023., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 5/22/2023; ANDREW SCHOFER served on 5/22/2023 (Casazza, Christopher)
May 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on May 22, 2023. (lccjn1)
May 15, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SCHOFER, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb)
May 15, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SCHOFER ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10067338) filed by MUHAMMAD SAMI, AJAR SAMI, SAMRA SAMI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-E, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons as to ANTONY BLINKEN, #4 Summons as to ANDREW SCHOFER, #5 Summons as to US Attorney's Office, #6 Summons as to US ATTORNEY GENERAL)(Casazza, Christopher)
May 15, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zcb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SAMI et al v. BLINKEN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD SAMI
Represented By: Christopher M. Casazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SAMRA SAMI
Represented By: Christopher M. Casazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AJAR SAMI
Represented By: Christopher M. Casazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW SCHOFER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?