THOMAS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| KIRTRIYA THOMAS |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2023cv01378 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Jia M Cobb |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Liran Koropitzer on behalf of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Koropitzer, Liran) |
MINUTE ORDER re #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: Having considered the motion and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motion. Defendant is ORDERED to respond to the Complaint by July 24, 2023. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on June 30, 2023. (lcjmc3)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Okereke, Christina) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Date of Service Upon the Mayor for the District of Columbia on 6/5/2023. (Keith, Pamela) Modified date of service on 6/7/2023 (znmw). |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 6/5/2023. Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 6/26/2023. (Keith, Pamela) Modified dates on 6/7/2023 (znmw). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to the District of Columbia Mayor. (znmw) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE by KIRTRIYA THOMAS re #1 Complaint filed by KIRTRIYA THOMAS. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by KIRTRIYA THOMAS.(Keith, Pamela) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to District of Columbia Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Jia M. Cobb. (zsl) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to pamkeith@centerforemploymentjustice.com, cc'd 3 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Missing summonses-DC govt. When naming a DC agent or agency as a defendant, you must supply a summons for each defendant & two additional summonses for the DC Mayor & DC Attorney General (zsl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10069904) filed by KIRTRIYA THOMAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Keith, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: THOMAS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KIRTRIYA THOMAS | |
| Represented By: | Pamela M. Keith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
| Represented By: | Christina Okereke |
| Represented By: | Liran Koropitzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
