HANNAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
AFSHAN HANNAN, MOHSIN ENTERPRISES LLC and MOHSIN ENTERPRISES LLC. |
ANTONY BLINKEN and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS |
1:2023cv01401 |
May 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
James E Boasberg |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 6/15/2023 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit and Proof of Service- AG, #2 Affidavit Affidavit and Proof of Service- US atty, #3 Affidavit Affidavit and Proof of Service- Mayorkas)(McClure, Lauren) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
Case Assigned to Chief Judge James E. Boasberg. (zcb) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by AFSHAN HANNAN, MOHSIN ENTERPRISES LLC (McClure, Lauren) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Writ of Mandamus against ANTONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10074693) filed by AFSHAN HANNAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons AG summons, #3 Summons Blinken summons, #4 Summons Mayorkas summons, #5 Summons US atty summons)(McClure, Lauren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.