DINH et al v. BLINKEN et al
Plaintiff: HUONG THI XUAN DINH and HUNG THE LE
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, UR M. JADDOU and IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE
Case Number: 1:2023cv01421
Filed: May 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Rudolph Contreras
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2023 Filing 4 Consent MOTION to Stay proceedings by ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE, UR M. JADDOU. (Rees, Kristen)
July 14, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #4 Defendants' Consent Motion to Stay. It is hereby ORDERED that the case is stayed until October 16, 2023. It is further ORDERED that the Parties submit a joint status report on that date informing the Court of the status of Plaintiffs' petitions. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 7-14-2023. (lcrc3)
July 12, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristen J. Rees on behalf of ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE, UR M. JADDOU (Rees, Kristen)
May 18, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE, UR M. JADDOU, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb)
May 18, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTONY J. BLINKEN, IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE, UR M. JADDOU ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10078378) filed by HUONG THI XUAN DINH, HUNG THE LE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons BLINKEN, #4 Summons JADDOU, #5 Summons IPO, #6 Summons USAG, #7 Summons USAO)(Bless, Jesse)
May 18, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zcb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DINH et al v. BLINKEN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HUONG THI XUAN DINH
Represented By: Jesse Matthew Bless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HUNG THE LE
Represented By: Jesse Matthew Bless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN
Represented By: Kristen J. Rees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UR M. JADDOU
Represented By: Kristen J. Rees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE
Represented By: Kristen J. Rees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?