HILBERT v. PHILZ COFFEE, INC.
| Laurel Hilbert |
| Philz Coffee, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv01572 |
| June 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by LAUREL HILBERT (Siegel, Eric) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by LAUREL HILBERT (Siegel, Eric) |
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of #6 the Notice of Settlement in Principle, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status report on or before September 5, 2023 if the matter has not been settled by then. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/7/2023. (lcrc1)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement in Principle by PHILZ COFFEE, INC. (Camacho, Jeremy) |
| Filing 5 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend the Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 with Consent by PHILZ COFFEE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Camacho, Jeremy) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Second Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before August 4, 2023. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 7/27/2023. (lcrc3)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint [ECF No. 1] by PHILZ COFFEE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Extension)(Camacho, Jeremy) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before July 28, 2023. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 7/7/2023. (lcrc3)
|
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. PHILZ COFFEE, INC. served on 6/16/2023, answer due 7/7/2023 (Siegel, Eric) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to PHILZ COFFEE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Philz Coffee, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10110182) filed by Laurel Hilbert. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Siegel, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HILBERT v. PHILZ COFFEE, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Laurel Hilbert | |
| Represented By: | Eric Lee Siegel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not classified by court: Philz Coffee, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
