MUBAIDIN v. BLINKEN et al
| MAEN JAMAL MOHAMMAD MUBAIDIN and MA'EN JAMAL MOHAMMAD MUBAIDIN |
| ANTONY BLINKEN, HENRY T. WOOSTER and ROHIT NEPAL |
| 1:2023cv01648 |
| June 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth A. Adebonojo on behalf of ANTONY BLINKEN, ROHIT NEPAL, HENRY T. WOOSTER (Adebonojo, Kenneth) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 6/22/2023. (lctjk2)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, ROHIT NEPAL, HENRY T. WOOSTER, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zsl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against ANTONY BLINKEN, ROHIT NEPAL, HENRY T. WOOSTER ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10124004) filed by MAEN JAMAL MOHAMMAD MUBAIDIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-G, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons as to ANTONY BLINKEN, #4 Summons as to HENRY T. WOOSTER, #5 Summons as to ROHIT NEPAL, #6 Summons as to US ATTORNEY GENERAL, #7 Summons as to US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE)(Casazza, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
