GONZALEZ v. GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC.
| ISAI JARA GONZALEZ |
| GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC. |
| 1:2023cv01650 |
| June 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
FOX/NEAL ORDER: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to respond to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, Dkt. #7 , on or before July 31, 2023. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 7/3/2023. (lcrdm2)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Balsam, Ethan). Added MOTION to Dismiss on 6/29/2023 (zjm).
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Grubhub Holdings, Inc.'s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, Dkt. #6 , it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant respond to Plaintiffs complaint on or before June 28, 2023. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 6/19/2023. (lcrdm2)
|
|
Filing 9
Receipt on 6/14/2023 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2023-CAB-002907. (ztnr)
|
|
Filing 6
First MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Balsam, Ethan)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 6/9/2023. (lcrdm2)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zsl)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph B. Greener on behalf of GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC. (Greener, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 2
LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC. (Greener, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from DC Superior, case number 2023 CA 002907 B Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADCDC-10124425 filed by GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice to Counsel/Party, #3 Superior Court Documents, #4 Notice of Filing Removal)(Balsam, Ethan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GONZALEZ v. GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ISAI JARA GONZALEZ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Ethan Daniel Balsam |
| Represented By: | Joseph B. Greener |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
