KAMALY v. BLINKEN et al
TAHEREH KAMALY |
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, MERRICK B. GARLAND, RICHARD C. VISEK, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY |
Director CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and SEAN MURPHY |
1:2023cv01898 |
June 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Reggie B Walton |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by TAHEREH KAMALY (Aramesh, Arash) |
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of the plaintiff's #3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on July 10, 2023. (lcrbw3) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
Case Assigned to Judge Reggie B. Walton. (zsl) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, SEAN MURPHY, RICHARD C. VISEK, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10174033) filed by TAHEREH KAMALY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons)(Aramesh, Arash) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.