SHERVEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| MATTHEW J. SHERVEN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, AVRIL HAINES and THOMAS MONHEIM |
| 1:2023cv01963 |
| July 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail.. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 7/27/2023. (zrtw)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 7/27/2023. (zrtw) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 07/07/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsl) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by MATTHEW J. SHERVEN. (mg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MATTHEW J. SHERVEN. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by MATTHEW J. SHERVEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(mg) |
| ENTERED IN ERROR.....SUMMONS Not Issued as to United States Attorney General (mg) Modified on 7/17/2023 (zsl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
