CUTHBERTSON v. ATKINS et al
| JALEN CUTHBERTSON |
| BRENTON ATKINS, ANTHONY BOONE, ALFRED BOYD, JOHNNY NORRIS, BENJAMIN RIKHOFF and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2023cv02005 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTHONY BOONE served on 9/6/2023 (Fiebig, Chantale) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting Defendant District of Columbia's #9 Consent Motion for Protective Order. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 9/7/2023. (lctjk1)
|
| Filing 12 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. BENJAMIN RIKHOFF served on 8/24/2023 (Fiebig, Chantale) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing re: BWC Footage by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Marimon, Nicole) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by BRENTON ATKINS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOHNNY NORRIS.(Marimon, Nicole) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Protective Order by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Featherstone, Kerslyn) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 9/5/2023. (lctjk1)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis A. Corkery on behalf of JALEN CUTHBERTSON (Corkery, Dennis) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant Norris's #6 Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. It is hereby ORDERED, nunc pro tunc and for good cause shown, that Defendant Norris's #6 consent motion to answer the Plaintiff's complaint is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by September 5, 2023. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 8/16/2023. (lctjk1)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint by JOHNNY NORRIS. (Marimon, Nicole) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JOHNNY NORRIS served on 7/19/2023, answer due 8/9/2023 (Fiebig, Chantale) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Marja Plater on behalf of JALEN CUTHBERTSON (Plater, Marja) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant District of Columbia's #3 Consent Motion to Extend Time. It is hereby ORDERED that, for good cause shown, Defendant District of Columbia's #3 consent motion for an extension of time to answer Plaintiff's complaint is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by September 5, 2023. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 8/3/2023. (lctjk1)
|
| Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Response to the Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Featherstone, Kerslyn) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zljn) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zljn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRENTON ATKINS, ANTHONY BOONE, ALFRED BOYD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOHNNY NORRIS, BENJAMIN RIKHOFF with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10200588) filed by JALEN CUTHBERTSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons (to Brenton Atkins), #3 Summons (to Anthony Boone), #4 Summons (to Alfred Boyd), #5 Summons (to Johnny Norris), #6 Summons (to Benjamin Rikhoff), #7 Summons (to D.C. Mayor), #8 Summons (to D.C. Attorney General))(Fiebig, Chantale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
