SAWABINI v. BECERRA et al
| LUTFALLAH T. SAWABINI |
| XAVIER BECERRA and LIVANTA LLC BFCC QIO MEDICARE CONTRATOR |
| 1:2023cv02041 |
| July 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Reggie B Walton |
| Contract: Recovery Medicare |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2345 Medicare Recovery |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Jonathan Brittin on behalf of LIVANTA LLC BFCC QIO MEDICARE CONTRATOR (Brittin, Alexander) |
| NOTICE OF ERROR regarding #3 Notice (Other). The following error(s) need correction: Incorrect format (Letter)- correspondence is not permitted (LCvR 5.1(a)). Please refile. (ztth) |
| Filing 3 ENTERED IN ERROR.....NOTICE Letter to Judge Walton by LIVANTA LLC BFCC QIO MEDICARE CONTRATOR (Brittin, Alexander); Modified on 8/22/2023 (ztth). |
| Filing 2 Letter from LUTFALLAH T. SAWABINI. "Leave to file granted." Signed by Judge Judge Reggie B. Walton on 8/2/2023.(ztth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against XAVIER BECERRA, LIVANTA LLC BFCC QIO MEDICARE CONTRATOR (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 205149) with Jury Demand filed by LUTFALLAH T. SAWABINI. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibits, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (ztth) |
| SUMMONS (4) Issued as to XAVIER BECERRA, LIVANTA LLC BFCC QIO MEDICARE CONTRATOR, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ztth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
