SHAKOORI v. BLINKEN et al
Plaintiff: MAHDIS SHAKOORI
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, MERRICK B. GARLAND, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, RICHARD C. VISEK and JEFFREY LODINSKY
Case Number: 1:2023cv02043
Filed: July 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2023 Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 10/30/2023. (dot)
September 11, 2023 Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, JEFFREY LODINSKY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, RICHARD C. VISEK, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Simon, Jeremy)
September 11, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Defendants' #4 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, in which Defendants seek a forty-five day extension. They explain that "the visa application at issue was refused under INA Section 221(g), and the consular officer has determined that additional information from sources other than the applicant may help establish whether the applicant is eligible for a visa." The requested extension will allow for this sharing of information, which may allow for further developments that may inform how the parties proceed in this case. Plaintiff consents to the motion. The Court therefore GRANTS the #4 Motion and ORDERS that Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint by no later than OCTOBER 30, 2023. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 9/11/23. (lcckk3)
July 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 07/25/23. (DM)
July 17, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, JEFFREY LODINSKY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, RICHARD C. VISEK, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw)
July 17, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, JEFFREY LODINSKY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, RICHARD C. VISEK, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10209965) filed by MAHDIS SHAKOORI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons)(Aramesh, Arash) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/17/2023) (zrtw). (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/17/2023) (zrtw).
July 17, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zrtw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHAKOORI v. BLINKEN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAHDIS SHAKOORI
Represented By: Arash Aramesh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN
Represented By: Jeremy S. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS
Represented By: Jeremy S. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND
Represented By: Jeremy S. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY
Represented By: Jeremy S. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Represented By: Jeremy S. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD C. VISEK
Represented By: Jeremy S. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JEFFREY LODINSKY
Represented By: Jeremy S. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?