MADADIZAVAREH v. GARLAND et al
| MONA MADADIZAVAREH |
| MERRICK GARLAND, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MARK MARRANO and JOHN DOES #1-#10 |
| 1:2023cv02049 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Tanya S Chutkan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to RENA BITTER, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND, MARK MARRANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Plaintiff's #2 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 07/20/2023. (lcss)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by MONA MADADIZAVAREH (Nimer, Jennifer) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zsl) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10211533) filed by MONA MADADIZAVAREH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Summons all defendants, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nimer, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
