NIGAM v. U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION et al
SHIVANGI RISHI NIGAM |
U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION and U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
1:2023cv02092 |
July 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Timothy J Kelly |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Case Stayed. (zkh) |
Filing 4 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings by U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION. (Moustakas, John) |
Filing 3 ERRATA of Summons to AUSA by SHIVANGI RISHI NIGAM re #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Issued Electronically as to AUSA. (Brown, Steven) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10216294) filed by SHIVANGI RISHI NIGAM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Summons As to CBP, #6 Summons As to USAG, #7 Summons As to USCIS, #8 Summons As to USAO)(Brown, Steven) |
Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.