ZIMMERMAN v. ZUCKERBERG et al
| ROBERT ZIMMERMAN |
| MARK ZUCKERBERG, META PLATFORMS, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES |
| 1:2023cv02139 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: 1) Defendant Mark Zuckerberg is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice; and 2) The Clerk shall direct the United States Marshals Service to effect service on Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. Signed by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/25/2023. (lcjeb2)
|
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge James E. Boasberg. (zsl) |
|
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Clerk of the Court shall assign this case randomly to a district judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 8/21/2023. (psu1)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROBERT ZIMMERMAN. (zsl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by ROBERT ZIMMERMAN. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zsl) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 07/21/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
