ALI v. FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD
Plaintiff: GHULAM ALI
Defendant: FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD
Case Number: 1:2023cv02158
Filed: July 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Rudolph Contreras
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GHULAM ALI (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 205174) with Jury Demand filed by GHULAM ALI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztth)
July 25, 2023 SUMMONS (3) Issued as to FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ztth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ALI v. FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GHULAM ALI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?