VAN DER STELT v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY et al
| CANDACE VAN DER STELT |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, BIOMEDICAL GRADUATE EDUCATION, TURKELTAUB and PETER TURKELTAUB |
| 1:2023cv02212 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary M. Gilbert on behalf of CANDACE VAN DER STELT (Gilbert, Gary) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 8/1/2023. (lcrdm1)
|
| Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CANDACE VAN DER STELT (Taubenblatt, Keith) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, BIOMEDICAL GRADUATE EDUCATION, PETER TURKELTAUB. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zcb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10244338) filed by CANDACE VAN DER STELT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Taubenblatt, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
