HILL v. UNITED STATES et al
| RUSSELL K. HILL |
| UNITED STATES, INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON BOUNDARIES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2023cv02270 |
| August 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted, Application for Three-Judge Court #3 is denied. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 08/29/2023. (zcb)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 08/29/2023. (zcb)
|
|
Filing 4
PARTIAL PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by RUSSELL K. HILL (zcb)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Convene Three-Judge Court by RUSSELL K. HILL. (zcb)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RUSSELL K. HILL. (zcb)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RUSSELL K. HILL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zcb)
|
|
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 08/04/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zcb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
