JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
| JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| 1:2023cv02271 |
| August 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/9/2023. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/8/2023.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 8/17/2023., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE served on 8/17/2023 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Cristina Rotaru)(Bekesha, Michael) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Meet & Confer Statement due by 10/23/2023. (dot) |
Filing 8
ORDER instructing parties to meet and confer and file joint status report by OCTOBER 23, 2023. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 9/11/23. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.(Eiswerth, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher A. Eiswerth on behalf of UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Eiswerth, Christopher) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 08/16/23. (DM)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zcb) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. filed by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Summons U,S. Attorney for DC, #2 Summons U.S. Atty General, #3 Summons U.S. Department of Justice)(Bekesha, Michael) Modified document number on 8/9/2023 (znmw). |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Bekesha, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-10257868) filed by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC..(Bekesha, Michael) Modified document number on 8/9/2023 (znmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Bekesha |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE | |
| Represented By: | Christopher A. Eiswerth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
