MONBO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: DEE MONBO
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and JOSEPH NEMEDY
Case Number: 1:2023cv02425
Filed: August 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: James E Boasberg
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's #13 Motion for CM/ECF password is GRANTED provided that Plaintiff complies with all requirements imposed by the Clerk's office. So ORDERED by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/4/2023. (lcjeb1)
October 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/20/2023. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/19/2023.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 9/22/2023., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JOSEPH NEMEDY served on 9/20/2023; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE served on 9/20/2023; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA served on 9/20/2023. (ztth)
October 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing by DEE MONBO. (ztth)
October 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by DEE MONBO. (ztth)
October 2, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: 1) Plaintiff's #12 Motion to Amend Complaint is GRANTED as no leave is required for an initial amendment; 2) Her [12-1] Amended Complaint is deemed FILED; 3) Defendants' #10 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as superseded; and 4) Defendants shall respond to the Amended Complaint by October 16, 2023. So ORDERED by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/2/2023. (lcjeb1)
October 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 10/16/2023. (nbn)
September 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, by DEE MONBO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Appendix A, #2 Exhibits 1 - 14) (ztth)
September 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' #10 Motion to Dismiss no later than October 12, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/28/2023. (znbn)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, Alternatively,, MOTION to Transfer Case and, MOTION to Stay by JOSEPH NEMEDY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hudak, Brian)
September 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (znmw)
September 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Chief Judge James E. Boasberg. (zljn)
September 14, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: First, having considered #3 Plaintiff's Motion for TRO/Preliminary Injunction, and acknowledging that Plaintiff has filed a superseding motion requesting the same relief, the Court DENIES #3 Plaintiff's Motion for TRO/Preliminary Injunction as moot. Second, having considered #4 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order, the Court DENIES the motion. The Court finds that it is premature to enter a protective order. Defendants have yet to enter an appearance in this case, and Plaintiff has not included any certification that she has conferred or attempted to confer with Defendants to discuss this issue prior to filing her motion, which is required under FRCP 26(c)(1). The Court finds that Plaintiff's concerns regarding sensitive information in her complaint have been resolved by the #7 Memorandum Opinion and Order from Chief Judge Boasberg granting her motion to file under seal. The Court encourages Plaintiff to confer with Defendants in submitting a joint motion for a protective order regarding discovery-specific concerns when appropriate. Third, having considered #8 Plaintiff's Motion for an Ex Parte TRO, the Court DENIES the motion for a TRO. A TRO is an extraordinary remedy. An ex parte TRO issued without notice to the adverse party is even more extraordinary. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has not described any efforts to give notice to Defendants, nor is the Court convinced that notice should not be required. Plaintiff therefore has not complied with the requirements of FRCP 65(b)(1). Finally, the Court DEFERS ruling on #8 Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. It appears that Defendants have not been served. Plaintiff did not provide a certificate of service with her #1 Complaint, and Defendants have not entered an appearance in this case. At this time, the Court will not rule on the preliminary injunction before Defendants have an opportunity to be heard. The Court reminds Plaintiff that she must serve Defendants with a copy of the summons and the complaint, as described in FRCP 4(i), by November 14, 2023. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on September 14, 2023. (lcjmc2)
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting #6 Sealed Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 09/07/2023. (lcjeb3)
September 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Exparte document, MOTION for Protective Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by DEE MONBO. (zljn) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/7/2023: #1 Affidavit) (zljn).
August 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SECOND SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL filed by DEE MONBO. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Exhibit, #2 Unredacted Complaint)(zljn)
August 24, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) Plaintiff's #2 Sealed Motion for Leave to File Complaint Under Seal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as it does not address the six-factor inquiry that applies to motions to seal court records, see United States v. Hubbard, 650 F.2d 293, 317-22 (D.C. Cir. 1980), or provide an unredacted version of the exhibits for the Court's review; and (2) Within fourteen days of this Order, Plaintiff must file a new motion that addresses the factors identified in Hubbard and provides an unredacted version of the exhibits for the Court's review or file an unredacted version of the complaint and exhibits for public docketing. So ORDERED by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 8/24/2023. (lcjeb4)
August 24, 2023 Opinion or Order ENTERED IN ERROR......Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zljn) Modified on 8/24/2023 (zljn).
August 24, 2023 Opinion or Order ENTERED IN ERROR.....Case Assigned to Judge Jia M. Cobb. (zljn) Modified on 8/25/2023 (zcb).
August 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by DEE MONBO (zsl)
August 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Protective Order by DEE MONBO. (Attachment: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(zsl)
August 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by DEE MONBO. (Attachment: #1 Affidavit)(zsl)
August 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL filed by DEE MONBO. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Complaint, #2 Unredacted Exhibit)(zsl)
August 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 205368) filed by DEE MONBO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(zsl) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/24/2023) (zsl). (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/24/2023) (zsl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MONBO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEE MONBO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Brian P. Hudak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Represented By: Brian P. Hudak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSEPH NEMEDY
Represented By: Brian P. Hudak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?