RUDOMETKIN v. COMMANDING GENERAL et al
| DAVID J. RUDOMETKIN |
| COMMANDING GENERAL, CHRISTINE WORMUTH and U.S. ARMY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL |
| 1:2023cv02549 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Prisoner Petition: Mandamus & Other (Other) |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against COMMANDING GENERAL, U.S. ARMY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL filed by DAVID J. RUDOMETKIN. (Attachment: #1 ExhibitS)(ztth) |
MINUTE ORDER denying #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Pleadings. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, Plaintiff does not require the Court's leave to file a first amended complaint before a response has been filed. It is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk's Office shall docket Plaintiff's attached amended complaint. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10/13/2023. (lcrc2)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by DAVID J. RUDOMETKIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit - Attachment) (ztth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMANDING GENERAL, CHRISTINE WORMUTH (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 205460) filed by DAVID J. RUDOMETKIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A - I, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ztth) |
| SUMMONS (3) Issued as to COMMANDING GENERAL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ztth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
