AKERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: MARTIN AKERMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 1:2023cv02597
Filed: September 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition: Motion to Vacate Sentence (Habeas Corpus)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2023 Filing 9 Supplemental Record on Appeal transmitted to US Court of Appeals re 10/24/2023 MINUTE Order on Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis ;USCA Case Number 23-5229. (zljn)
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of #8 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, affirming his inability to prepay the appellate court's docketing fee or to give security therefor, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Clerk shall transmit this order promptly to the Court of Appeals. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on 10/24/2023. (psu1)
October 18, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by MARTIN AKERMAN. (zljn)
October 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER of USCA as to #5 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court filed by MARTIN AKERMAN ; USCA Case Number 23-5229. (zljn)
October 17, 2023 USCA Case Number 23-5229 for #5 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court filed by MARTIN AKERMAN. (zljn)
October 11, 2023 Filing 6 Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed (Memorandum Opinion), and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals fee was paid re #5 Notice of Appeal to DC Circuit Court. (zcb)
October 10, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO DC CIRCUIT COURT as to #4 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case, by MARTIN AKERMAN. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (zcb)
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is denied and that Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel and for a CM/ECF Password #3 , is DENIED as moot. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on 10/04/2023. (zljn)
September 25, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for CM/ECF Password by MARTIN AKERMAN. (zljn)
September 5, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARTIN AKERMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(zljn) Modified on 9/7/2023 (zljn).
September 5, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255); filed by MARTIN AKERMAN.(zljn). (Additional attachment(s) : #1 Exhibit) (zljn).
September 5, 2023 Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 9/5/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zljn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AKERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARTIN AKERMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?