JENKINS v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES et al
GARY V. JENKINS |
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and JOE BIDEN |
1:2023cv02664 |
September 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis and motion for summary judgement is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on 10/19/2023. (zrtw) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Unassigned on 10/19/2023. (zrtw) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Summary Judgment by GARY V. JENKINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(zrtw) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by GARY V. JENKINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Affidavit)(zrtw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOE BIDEN, OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES with Jury Demand filed by GARY V. JENKINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Notice and Consent)(zrtw) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 9/12/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrtw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.